Grape Variety: Salt Creek

Variety Name	Salt Creek
Common Synonyms	Ramsey
All Synonyms	Ramsey
Countries of Origin	USA
Species	Natural cross
Pedigree	V. x champinii
References	Show 4 references Hide references Christensen, L et al. 2003. Wine Grape Varieties in California. University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 3419. Galet, P. 1998. Grape Varieties and Rootstock Varieties. Oenoplurimedia sarl. Chateau de Chaintre, France. Pongracz, D.P. 1983. Rootstocks for Grape-vines. David Philip, Cape Town, South Africa. Vitis International Variety Catalogue (VIVC). Federal Centre for Breeding Research on Cultivated Plants (BAZ). Institute for Grapevine Breeding Geilweilerhof (IRZ). August, 2007. Link The former National Grape Registry (NGR) was initially compiled and annotated using the earlier version of the Vitis database. The VIVC underwent a significant update beginning in 2007. Corresponding updates to this Registry will be made as necessary.
Berry Color	Black
Uses	Rootstock
Comments	'Salt Creek' is a synonym for the rootstock known as Ramsey. The true Salt Creek (V. doaniana) is not used as a rootstock.

Salt Creek PhotosClick photo to enlarge

Minimize Photos

Salt Creek Selections

Information about: Selection Numbers | Registration Status

How Selection Numbers are Created

Questions are often asked as to how Foundation Plant Services (FPS) decides which number to assign to the grape selections in the foundation vineyard and whether those numbers relate to particular clones that may be the sources of the FPS selections.

The answer for most selections in the FPS foundation vineyard is that selection numbers are assigned by the next available (unused) number in sequence for that variety. There is nothing magical about it. For example, the first Sauvignon blanc selection that came to FPS in 1958 was named Sauvignon blanc FPS 01. The next Sauvignon blanc arrival received the name Sauvignon blanc FPS 02. Gaps in the numbering system in the current list of available selections mean that the omitted number was taken out of circulation for some reason, such as death from disease.

FPS intentionally chose the word "selection" rather than "clone" when referring to the products offered in the foundation vineyard. The word "clone" can be confusing and ambiguous. The major European collections have formal evaluation protocols for grape material to qualify material for release as an official "clone". Evaluation criteria includes field performance and wine making characteristics.

FPS does not perform formal clonal evaluations on the grapevine materials accepted for the foundation vineyard. The word "selection" at FPS simply means the material was collected from a single source vine from the vineyard of origin, whether within the United States or from a foreign vineyard. Some of our numbered selections have been through trials here in California but FPS does not conduct those trials or evaluations.

Having said that, there is a subgroup of selections at FPS that are official numbered clones from the formal clonal development programs in Europe. Those official clones are imported and sold by the owners as proprietary (trademarked) clonal material in the United States. The owners are large government or nursery entities in Europe, such as the ENTAV-INRA® clonal material from the IFV program in France. In order to preserve the identity of those clones, FPS agreed to assign them the same official clone number that the program in Europe gave them when released there. Cabernet Sauvignon 685 from France received the name Cabernet Sauvignon ENTAV-INRA® 685 at FPS. The owners of those proprietary clones are the ones who vouch for or affirm the authenticity of their trademarked clones.

Lastly, there is a small subset of "clones" that came to FPS in the 1980's prior to the establishment of the trademark programs for the European clones. Those clones also came to the United States associated with clone numbers assigned when the clones were developed in Europe. Many of the French clones in that group were developed at Dijon in France and the material has been known as the "Dijon clones". Those French clones were not protected by an official trademark program at the time they came to the United States. Some of those clones are no longer used in France and some were incorporated into the ENTAV-INRA trademark program.

FPS refers to this subset of clones as "generic clonal material". FPS agreed that we would assign those non-proprietary clones a new number at FPS rather than the European clonal number. They received their FPS numbers using the "next in order" rule. We may have a note on the plant description that the selection is "reported to be a certain French clone number". FPS cannot guarantee that such a selection is the official French clone number that it was formally associated with in France.

	Salt Creek 01A
Registration Status	Registered Registered is the ultimate status in the California Department of Food & Agricultures Grapevine Registration & Certification Program. Registered selections have successfully completed all disease testing required by the regulations. Registered selections have also been confirmed as true to variety by experts using visual observations, DNA-based testing or both.
Source	Department of Viticulture & Enology, University of California, Davis
Treatments	None
Comments	This material is one of a group of Salt Creek selections that originated from a vine at location H98 v8 in the old Armstrong vineyard on the campus of the University of California, Davis. That vineyard was developed and maintained by the Department of Viticulture & Enology at the university. The vine at location H98v8 was planted in the Armstrong vineyard sometime prior to 1950. Prior to 1961, plant material was taken from the vine at H98v8 and put through preliminary index testing at Foundation Plant Services. The material was subsequently planted as Salt Creek 01A in 1961 in the old FPS foundation vineyard west of Hopkins Road (locations A11 v2-13, 15-21 in the old foundation vineyard). In 1964, eight new selections were created from Salt Creek 01A; each new selection was subjected to heat treatment therapy for a different number of days. All eight selections were given a unique selection number (Salt Creek FPS 02A, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, and 09). FPS Program Manager Curtis Alley labelled for marketing purposes all eight selections and Salt Creek 01A as what he called 'Superclone #128' in the early 1970's - the group was based on the fact that all the selections in the group originated from the same source vine (H98v8).
	Salt Creek 08
Registration Status	Registered Registered is the ultimate status in the California Department of Food & Agricultures Grapevine Registration & Certification Program. Registered selections have successfully completed all disease testing required by the regulations. Registered selections have also been confirmed as true to variety by experts using visual observations, DNA-based testing or both.
Source	Department of Viticulture & Enology, University of California, Davis
Treatments	Heat treatment 112 days , Tissue Culture Excision
Comments	This material is one of a group of Salt Creek selections that originated from a vine at location H98 v8 in the old Armstrong vineyard on the campus of the University of California, Davis. That vineyard was developed and maintained by the Department of Viticulture & Enology at the university. The vine at location H98v8 was planted in the Armstrong vineyard sometime prior to 1950. Prior to 1961, plant material was taken from the vine at H98v8 and put through preliminary index testing at Foundation Plant Services. The material was subsequently planted in 1961 as Salt Creek 01A in the old FPS foundation vineyard west of Hopkins Road (locations A11 v2-13, 15-21 in the old foundation vineyard). In 1964, eight new selections were created from Salt Creek 01A; each new selection was subjected to heat treatment therapy for a different number of days. All eight selections were given a unique selection number (Salt Creek FPS 02A, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, and 09). FPS Program Manager Curtis Alley labelled for marketing purposes all eight selections and Salt Creek 01A as 'Superclone #128' in the early 1970's - the group was based on the fact that all the selections in the group originated from the same source vine (H98v8). Salt Creek 08 underwent heat treatment therapy for 112 days in 1964. After successful completion of testing for the California Grapevine Registration & Certification Program, Salt Creek 08 was planted in the old foundation vineyard in 1965.